Up
against Richard Gere and Nicole Kidman, the historical record
doesn’t stand a chance. Gere
is in Bosnia and Kidman
just visited Kosovo. Beating a dead horse, the former
is entering the familiar genre of anti-Serb films (Behind
Enemy Lines, The Peacemaker) — and UN Goodwill
Ambassador (and, coincidentally, Peacemaker star) Kidman
is listening to more unverifiable yarns from Kosovo’s
Serb-loathing Albanian Moslems (without, of course, visiting those
who are actually under siege in the province — the handful of
remaining Serbs who can’t step outside their miniscule
NATO-guarded perimeters without getting killed
by Albanians).
How can we
fight the jihad when Kidman and Gere are being used to enable it?
Just when the Aussie gave us some hope in so prominently signing
her name to an anti-terror ad in the L.A. Times — going
against the grain and calling terrorism against Israelis by its
name — we’re still at Square One when it comes to terrorism
against Serbs.
Of course,
if our own government is helping
the jihad secure its Balkan base, what does one want from
two actors?
For Gere’s
movie — a “light-hearted thriller” entitled Spring Break
in Bosnia that has him hunting down the fugitive former
Bosnian-Serb leader Radovan Karadzic — filming is being done in
Croatia and Bosnia, with the help of local propagandists as
consultants, of course. The Serbs, yet again, will be collectively
portrayed as the villains in the Balkan tale. Never mind that Gere
returned from Bosnia to Croatia ahead of schedule last month,
after only 10 days of shooting, reportedly
because he was “too scared to stay” in the area.
One wonders
what could have spooked him. What did he have to fear from Bosnia?
Could it be the ominous signs that the country has been reawakened
by the Saudis from its Communist slumber to its Islamic roots? Or
did something happen that might have reasserted Bosnia’s fascist
sympathies, which the UK Telegraph’s Robert Fox described
in 1993:
These are
the men of the Handzar division. “We do everything with the
knife, and we always fight on the frontline,” a Handzar told
one U.N. officer. Up to 6000 strong, the Handzar division
glories in a fascist culture. They see themselves as the heirs
of the SS Handzar division, formed by Bosnian Muslims in 1943 to
fight for the Nazis. Their spiritual model was Mohammed Amin
al-Hussein, the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem who sided with Hitler.
According to U.N. officers… “[m]any of them are Albanian,
whether from Kosovo…or from Albania itself.”
They are
trained and led by veterans from Afghanistan and Pakistan, say
U.N. sources…The first political act in this new operation
appears to have been the murder of the two monks in the
monastery…Mysteriously the police guard disappeared a few
minutes before.
Or maybe
something happened after Gere “disappeared down a small street
in Sarajevo’s old Turkish quarter to film the next scene,” as
BBC.com reported.
“It is the early hours of the morning and a Hollywood film crew
with blazing lights and buzzing walky-talkies is being put through
its paces in the shadow of a mosque.”
Whatever it
was, Gere returned to the “villa on a hill” where he’d been
staying in Zagreb, Croatia. Though the Catholic Croats and Moslem
Bosnians are often at each other’s throats, they have an uncanny
similarity. You see, “Croatian” is more or less a synonym for
“Nazi.” Except the Croatians managed to sicken
even the Germans with the creative lengths they went to for
Serb-slaughter, including sawing
heads off slowly. (Bosnian Moslems, meanwhile, served in
Croatia’s concentration camps such as Jasenovac, where 700,000
Serbs were killed alongside tens of thousands of Jews.)
Nazism is
not just part of Croatia’s past;
it is their present
as well.
In 1998, NY
Times columnist A.M. Rosenthal wrote: “In World War II,
Hitler had no executioners more willing, no ally more passionate,
than the fascists of Croatia. They are returning, 50 years later,
from what should have been their eternal grave, the defeat of Nazi
Germany. The Western Allies who dug that grave with the bodies of
their servicemen have the power to stop them, but do not.”
Indeed, we
happily assisted
them — even providing Croatia with Serbian weapons to kill
Serbs.
In an
article titled “Pro-Nazi extremism lingers in Croatia,” the Washington
Times in 1997 reported: “A German tank rolls through a
small village, and the peasants rush out, lining the road with
their right arms raised in a Nazi salute as they chant ‘Heil
Hitler.’ Mobs chase minorities from their homes, kicking them
and pelting them with eggs as they flee into the woods. Europe in
the 1940s? No. Croatia in the 1990s.”
In 1995, the
London Evening Standard’s Edward Pearce wrote that
“you can understand Croatia best by saying flatly that if there
is one place in the world where a statue of Adolph Hitler would be
revered, it would be in Zagreb.”
An AP report
the same year described NATO American Commander Colonel Gregory
Fontenot in Bosnia turning to two black soldiers in his brigade
and saying, “It’ll be interesting to hear what you two see,
because the Croatians are racist…They kill people for the color
of their skins.”
In 2000,
Julius Strauss wrote in the UK Daily Telegraph, “Five
years may have passed since the end of the Bosnian war but in
Ljubuski, one of dozens of Croat villages scattered through the
mountains of southwestern Bosnia, hardliners are still in control.
By way of greeting, the Croat party official said: ‘I hope
you’re not a Jew or an American. My father fought at Stalingrad.
He wore the German insignia with pride. At the end it was only us
Croats who stayed faithful to the SS.’
The same
year, there was this from The Washington Post: “It was
not unusual to see such chilling graffiti as: ‘We Croats do not
drink wine, we drink the blood of Serbs from Knin,’ …
[referring] to the capital of the Krajina region of Croatia where
hundreds of thousands of Serbs were ethnically cleansed in 1995 by
troops commanded by Gen. [Ante] Gotovina.”
In her
September 1999 book Nazi Nostalgia in Croatia, Balkans expert
Diana Johnstone wrote:
When I
visited Croatia three years ago, the book most prominently
displayed in the leading bookstores of the capital city Zagreb
was a new edition of the notorious anti-Semitic classic, “The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion”. Next came the memoirs of the
World War II Croatian fascist Ustashe dictator Ante Pavelic,
responsible for the organized genocide of Serbs, Jews and Romany
(gypsies) that began in 1941, that is, even before the German
Nazi ‘final solution’.
And the
hit song of 1991, when Croatia once again declared its
independence from Yugoslavia and began driving out Serbs, was
“Danke Deutschland” in gratitude to Germany’s strong
diplomatic support for Zagreb’s unnegotiated secession. In the
West, of course, one will quickly object that the Germany of
today is not the Germany of 1941. True enough. But in Zagreb,
with a longer historical view, they are so much the same that
visiting Germans are sometimes embarrassed when Croats
enthusiastically welcome them with a raised arm and a Nazi “Heil!”
greeting.
So it
should be no surprise that this year’s best seller in Croatia
is none other than a new edition of “Mein Kampf”. The
magazine “Globus” reported that “Mein Kampf” is selling
like hotcakes in all segments of Croatian society.
Despite the
Simon Wiesenthal Center’s requests for it to seek extradition,
the Croatian government remains uninterested
in going after two Croatian Nazis (Ustashi) who killed hundreds of
Jews, Serbs and gypsies and now live in brazen retirement in
Argentina and Austria.
As
independent journalist Stella Jatras summed up, “Today, Croatia
arrogantly and blatantly flies its fascist checkerboard flag
without fear of condemnation from the world. It has renamed its
streets after its Nazi war heroes, and proudly displays its
‘Sieg Heil’ salute at weddings, funerals, and other
functions.”

Zagreb
Croatia 2006
Reenter the
moviemakers. Croatian film director Antun Vrdoljak has cast his
son-in-law, “ER” actor Goran Visnjic, to play the role of the
Hague’s top Croatian war crimes suspect Ante Gotovina. According
to BBC.com, director Vrdoljak “said he wanted to make the
feature film because Gen Gotovina ‘is a real hero of the
homeland war’…Gen Gotovina is charged with committing
atrocities against Croatian Serbs during the 1990s Balkan wars.”
“Gotovina
is a metaphor for today’s Croatia,” Vrdoljak said proudly. According
to London’s The Independent, “posters with his photo are still
plastered across Croatia; T-shirts, mugs and lighters bearing his
image are sold and the Spanish wine he was drinking when arrested
quickly sold out when it appeared in Croatian stores in
December.” Vrdoljak has said that he is certain Gotovina will be
set free.
He has
reason to be certain. While to the world, “Serb” is synonymous
with “war criminal” and there is a permanent fixation with the
two Serbian fugitives Radovan Karadzic and Ratko Mladic, killers
of Serbs go unpunished,
get acquitted
or convicted and released to a hero’s
welcome — as Serbs are sentenced to death for killing
people who aren’t
even dead. In Croatia, Serb-cleansing is a national
holiday. Whereas Serbia established its own war crimes
court in cooperation with the Hague and has been convicting
its war criminals, Croatians, Albanians and Bosniaks rally behind
their Serb killers, make cinematic homages to them and allow them
to pursue political
careers .
As for the
subject of Gere’s fascination — Karadzic, wanted for
“ordering the massacre
of ‘8,000’ Moslem males”: five thousand were
reported missing by their families when they fled to fight
elsewhere before Srebrenica’s fall, and 3,000 of those have
since voted in elections. The remains of the other 3,000, which
have been found in and around Srebrenica, died during the three
years of fighting, not just when the enclave was overtaken by the
Bosnian Serbs. These three years of fighting included the
Srebrenica Moslems raiding nearby Serb villages and slaughtering
several thousand people. But they’re only Serbs and, in practice
at least, Serb-killing is a legal, internationally sanctioned sport.
As with
Bosnia’s Handzar division, in Croatia’s Serb-cleansing war of
secession from Yugoslavia, the Croats were gifted with an Albanian
volunteer — Agim Ceku — such a Serb-hunting enthusiast that
when the early, Croatian leg of the wars kicked off, this Kosovo
Albanian high-tailed it to Croatia and became a colonel in its
army. He led Croatian troops in the 1993 offensive on Croatia’s
Medak Pocket, where Serbs lived. As Canadian journalist Scott
Taylor wrote:
It was
here that the men of the 2nd Battalion of Princess Patricia’s
Canadian Light Infantry came face to face with the savagery of
which [Agim] Ceku was capable. Over 200 Serbian inhabitants of
the Medak Pocket were slaughtered in a grotesque manner (the
bodies of female rape victims were found after being burned
alive). Our traumatized troops who buried the grisly remains
were encouraged to collect evidence and were assured that the
perpetrators would be brought to justice.
Nevertheless
in 1995, Ceku, by then trained by U.S. instructors as a general
of artillery, was still at large. In fact, he was the officer
responsible for shelling the Serbian refugee columns and for
targeting the UN-declared “safe” city of Knin during the
Croatian offensive known as Operation Storm [which the New York
Times called “the largest single ‘ethnic cleansing’ of the
war”]. Some 500 innocent civilians perished in those merciless
barrages, and senior Canadian officers who witnessed the
slaughter demanded that Ceku be indicted. Once again, their
pleas fell of deaf ears.
Today Ceku
is the Prime Minister of Kosovo, and he enjoyed a warm reception
from Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice when the two met over the
summer to discuss how best to speed along independence for the
Serbian province that this war criminal governs, sans rule of law
and beholden
to al-Qaeda.
“Throughout
the air campaign against Yugoslavia,” continues Taylor, Ceku —
by then commanding KLA terrorists in driving two-thirds of the
remaining Christian Serbs out, along with the gypsies, Croats,
Jews, Ashkalis, Gorani, and other non-Moslem or non-Albanians in
Kosovo — “was portrayed as a loyal ally and he was frequently
present at NATO briefings with top generals such as Wesley Clark
and Michael Jackson.”
Today, the
“bin Laden Mosque,” built in 2001 (aptly enough), stands tall
in Kosovo, where Bill Clinton murals and Wesley Clark Streets are
almost as prevalent as bin
Laden keychains.
Re-enter
Richard Gere, who in 1999 traveled
to Macedonia to volunteer in a Kosovo refugee camp. “Reuters
reports Hollywood heart throb Richard Gere took tea with ethnic
Albanian Kosovo refugees in Macedonia yesterday and promised he
would do all he could to help them.” On the UK Biography
Channel’s website at the time, it read,
“If nothing else, he uses his star status to give greater voice
to his heartfelt beliefs.”
And now Gere
will use his star status to naively promote the Moslem and Croat
causes. Bosnia and Croatia, our modern Fascist allies against our
multi-ethnic World War II ally against Fascism —
Serbia.
In 1999,
Gere said, “Look, I have the resources and the inclination to
find out what’s going on in the world. So I feel this
responsibility to find out and do the best I can.”
In which
case he should want to know something about WWII, to better
appreciate how the Croatia and Bosnia stories played out in the
1990s, and why the Serbs reacted as they did. Yugoslavia’s 40+
years of Communism were a mere interruption in the multilateral
genocide of Serbs, which picked up where it left off immediately
upon Communism’s decline.
Though he
ultimately came around to the dominant, de riguer view of
the Albanian-Serb conflict, Gere initially had this to say in
1999: “We had been told it was a totally black and white
situation and in my estimation it’s not black and white.
Obviously the violence is horrific, but it’s horrific on all
sides.” And this is precisely the point: The Serbs weren’t
angels, and they are the only Balkan players to have admitted as
much. The trouble is that they were less guilty than their
enemies, whose side we inexplicably took. And so it is the Serbs
whom we hunt. Because it’s easier.
Gere, who is
passionate about “learning” why war criminals remain uncaught,
recently said of them, “I’m interested in people who cause so
much mischief, so much suffering…I think we can learn from them.
Why they are the way they are and why are we so vulnerable to
them.”
Director
Richard Shepard echoed that he hopes the film “is asking a
bigger question, which is why are there war criminals throughout
the world who the world said they want to catch and yet they
don’t.”
But in
choosing a Serbian war criminal as the vehicle through which to
answer this question is a hackneyed copout. It is yet another
uncontroversial, effortless, risk-free Hollywood choice. (See
reality-departure flicks The Pacifier (2004) and The
Rock (1999), where the setups involve “Serbian
terrorists.”) The obsession with Balkans war criminals who are
exclusively Serbian is all the more defamatory, given that wartime
Bosnian Moslem leader Alija Izetbegovic and Croat leader Franjo
Tudjman escaped justice by dying free men as their own war crimes
were quietly and reluctantly being investigated by The Hague.
Our
policymakers and our media, on the same page throughout the '90s
Balkans, took the Hollywood approach themselves, picking the easy
side and recycling Moslem and Croatian propaganda about the
conflict. They wanted a tale of easy morality, with clear-cut good
guys and bad guys. But in no region has this been less clear than
the Balkans. “Spring Break in Bosnia” is based on real events
in which three American journalists who returned to Sarajevo to
try to track down Karadzic themselves — proving Media
Cleansing author Peter Brock’s thesis that in
the Balkans, the press served openly as co-belligerents in the
conflict. Perversely, for the cinematic repetition of our Balkans
sins, “auditions for extras have already been held in several
Croatian cities and hundreds of people lined up for the chance to
appear.”
The Balkans
drama was scripted from the beginning. By a bipartisan slate of
Congresspeople who lined their pockets with Albanian, Bosnian and
Croatian money drenched in half a century of Serbian blood (e.g.
Engel, Tancredo, McCain, Dole and Dole, Lantos, Hyde, Rohrbacher,
Lieberman, etc…). And by journalists who, in a departure from
their usual shades-of-gray vision of the world, built careers and
won Pulitzers on concocting a cheap morality tale that permanently
designated the Serbs as international pariahs, as Brock explains
in his book. And so Serbs-as-villains has to be played out ad
infinitum.
That’s why
the current movie The Prestige omits any mention of the
fact that the David Bowie character — Nikola Tesla, inventor of,
among other things, a transformer capable of wirelessly lighting
up distant fluorescent bulbs — is a Serb, in whose honor a New
York street was named this year. And yet such civilized
contributions are so much more the norm for Serbs than is genocide
— our programmed association with them no matter how many times,
ways and places it’s been disproved,
including at the Hague (which had to redefine
the term ‘genocide’ to make it fit the alleged
crime). Comically enough, Croatia also celebrates
Tesla, who was born there, in what amounts to a classic case of
the Croatian credo that “the only good Serb is a dead Serb.”
It’s a
curious thing that the ones to bestow and propagate the
Serbs-as-Nazis image have been Nazis and Nazi nostalgics
themselves. Take the UN’s “impartial” mediator for the
Kosovo negotiations, Martti Ahtisaari of Finland, who this year
made it official: the accursed Serbs “as a nation are guilty.”
But note that the Finnish government during Ahtisaari’s
presidency tried to bankroll a monument
to the country’s volunteer troops of the Waffen SS. If that’s
not enough to taint a man in fascist hues, the fact that he was
the favorite this year for the Nobel Peace Prize should.
We should
view with great skepticism the branding of a people as
“brutal” or “ruthless” when the people doing the branding
were and/or are, literally, Nazis — and their jihadist former
apprentices. If such breeds complain of an enemy’s
“brutality,” it probably means that this enemy fights back
like none of the former’s other victims have. There’s a reason
that unlike Europe’s other concentration camps, which were
placed in remote areas, the Sajmiste
camp was in clear view of Belgrade’s populace.
“[T]hat was the intention,” explained Aleksandar Mosic, author
of The Jews in Belgrade, “to intimidate other Serbs by
showing them what was going on inside because Serbs were much more
courageous in resisting the Fascists than other nations.”
Our
filmmakers, like our policymakers, refuse to take the messier,
more accurate and more dangerous route to presenting the Balkans.
For it is the more daunting task, and one that would bring us face
to face with the realization that was perhaps what spooked Gere
first-hand: that the Serbs weren’t just fighting their enemies;
they were fighting ours.
Coincidentally,
the film which just won the top prize at the Rome Film Festival is
another Richard Gere pic. It’s called The Hoax, and is
based on a real-life hoax. Gere and his producers should be aware
that their current project is, as well.