It
is a fundamental tenet of capitalism that free market competition
is good for the people and the country. That's why Congress wisely
enacted anti-trust legislation a century or so ago - to prevent
big, powerful monopolies from eliminating their competition by
stifling the little guy.
But
today Americans are threatened by a government-sponsored and
taxpayer-funded monopoly, one that is potentially more powerful
and dangerous than the old Standard Oil and Carnegie Steel
operations. Like a giant octopus with long, deadly tentacles, the
socialistic "Official Public Education Trust" has established a
virtual stranglehold on the impressionable minds of our nation's
youth.
The
Public Education Establishment in America is controlled by the
Federal government through the unconstitutional Department of
Education and is supported by the left-leaning teachers' union,
the National Education Association. These power-hungry academic
oligarchs desperately want their 3-Rs racket to become the only
game in town.
Compulsory
attendance requirements and anti-truancy regulations allow the
long enforcement arm of the law to stretch into homes and
classrooms all over America. The problem for these frustrated
educrats, though, is the fact that their failed system doesn't
work as well as the competition. The private sector has always
been able to out-produce the government system.
Rich
folks with enough money could always buy their children a
top-notch education in the pricier private schools, and that's
still true today. But the real threat to the public school
monopoly comes from the rapidly growing Home School movement in
America.
Why?
Because the numbers prove that average Moms and Dads who take the
time to teach their children themselves are able to get much
better results for a fraction of the cost. The statistics compiled
by both the Department of Education's own Educational Resource
Information Center (ERIC) and by private researchers bear witness
to this truth.
On
nationally standardized achievement tests, the average score for
all public school students is 50 in all areas. For all home
schooled students taking the same tests, the average score for the
complete battery of tests was 87, a whopping difference of 37
percentile points. For example: Total Reading, 87; Total Math, 82;
Social Studies, 85. In every category, the home-schooled kids
out-performed their public school peers.
According
to Bryan D. Ray, PhD, president of the National Home Education
Research Institute, the number of home-schoolers has been growing
for the past two decades at a rate of between 7 and 15 percent per
year, making this the fastest growing form of education. Close to
two million American children in grades K-12 were being educated
at home in the 2002-2003 school year, with similar overall
success.
The
education monopoly can't dispute these figures, let alone
duplicate them, although they spend approximately ten times as
much per student only to get dismal results. So they try to
discredit home schooling in other ways. One way is to set up a
straw man called (aptly enough) "Socialization," and then knock it
down.
"The
isolation implicit in home teaching is anathema to socialization
and citizenship. It is a rejection of community and makes the
home-schooler the captive of the orthodoxies of the parents,"
charges Dr. Dennis Evans, who directs the doctoral programs in
education leadership at the University of California, Irvine. "Schools,
particularly public schools, are the one place where all of the
children of all of the people come together,'" explained Dr. Evans
in his 2003 "USA Today" op-ed piece entitled "Home is no place for
school." Kids taught by parents and inculcated with their values
might miss out on "an openness to diversity and new ideas," he
warned.
Yes,
and they might also miss out on dangerous drugs, gang violence,
sacrilegious and degrading music, peer pressure to try sex before
marriage, teen pregnancy, and sexually transmitted diseases, to
mention just a few of the more prominent aspects of the "socialization"
being democratically spread through the public school system
daily.
Some
parents might actually prefer that their children would continue
to address them respectfully as "sir" and "ma'am" rather than "dude."
Or that they might spend their free time doing something more
constructive than swapping pills at Pharming parties.
Frankly,
the whole socialization argument is bogus, too. Fully 98 percent
of home-schooled kids are involved in two or more extracurricular
activities with other kids outside the home. These just happen to
be of a more wholesome type, like field trips (84 percent), Sunday
School classes (77 percent), group sports (48 percent), music
classes (47 percent), and volunteer work (33 percent). (Read
some of the many inspiring home school success stories. View
the academic statistics.)
Some
states tightly regulate home schools to make sure that they toe
the curricular line. Others do little or nothing to monitor home-schoolers.
Either way, the academic results are statistically the same.
Home-schooled kids excel across the board, whether they are
scrutinized or ignored by the State.
In
my own state of North Carolina, an abortive effort to bring home-schoolers
under the control of the Department of Public Education was
derailed by the protests of outraged parents last Spring. I was
glad to see that happen because I know that parents - and not
bureaucrats in Washington, D.C., or Raleigh, NC - should make
the final decisions about their children's education.
Elected
officials should actively fight for the rights of home school
parents and their children to live free from intrusive government
regulations. If liberals truly believe in tolerance, then give
home-schooling families a tax credit.
Our
children are our greatest natural resource. If parents are willing
to invest the time and effort to train their children to be
critical thinkers, law-abiding citizens, and productive adults,
then I think that we as a nation need to invest in them, too.
Copyright ©
2005 by Nathan Tabor. Author's
email
Nathan Tabor
is a conservative political activist based in Kernersville, North
Carolina. He has his BA in psychology and his MA in public policy.
He is a contributing editor at The
Conservative Voice.
Comment
on this article.